We are absolutely interested in leveraging our technical expertise to conduct the country-level case studies directly, as well as to synthesize the evidence across multiple examples thereof (whether conducted by ourselves or our partners). Thanks for flagging that needs clarification in the final application! Unlike some of the other excellent proposals by larger organizations, though, Tomorrow Global lacks on-the-ground staff or field offices and so would both incur higher travel costs as well as lean more heavily on the local USAID representatives (or other consortium members) for logistics and introductions. Depending on Digital Square's priorities, we initially assumed that would likely put us at a comparative disadvantage for that portion of the work and so had hoped this analytical contribution would appeal to other applicants, e.g. as a supplement to their existing consortia. (On the last Q&A call we posed the idea of focusing on a narrower subset of the overall project and were told this would be an acceptable strategy.) On the other hand, our relative geographic neutrality means we are less biased toward any particular program. With that in mind, would you prefer that we significantly scale up the scope of our work rather than limiting ourselves to a complementary role?